We have things to say

Retailers & Customers: Differing Perspectives in New Payment Technology

If only updates to financial technology were adopted as fast as updates to the iPhone. In reality, though, the dynamics for new technology and its place in the market are quite different. There are a number of reasons that accepting credit cards for small business, and other new forms of payment don’t move as quickly as, say, new features get adopted in smartphones.

Regulators

First, regulatory environments play a key factor. The largest example of regulations setting the pace of tech adoption can be found in the difference between EMV adoption in Europe and other markets far ahead of the United States. The US dragged its feet, and as a result experienced far higher credit card fraud, until regulators stepped in to speed the process, spearheaded by President Obama’s signing of a 2014 executive order to speed things up. Overall, if lawmakers are warm to new technologies, things can move very fast. If there is confusion or opposition to the tech, it may take longer.

Business owners & Public opinion

Small business owners are huge stakeholders in the process of adopting new technologies; after all, they hold an outsized responsibility in footing the bill of implementing these new technologies. Still, the cornerstone, in a sense, to all changes, is public opinion of the technology. If there is an undue burden on the consumer, in the form of time, effort, or inconvenience (and of course, cost), there will be a lot going against the adoption of the new tech. This is often the least of the problems, though, as generally speaking, though, novel payment technology is designed to reduce, not increase the burden.

Differing Perspectives

One such example of new technology is biometric authentication (which is already pretty well established in the phone sector). This is most commonly a fingerprint or facial recognition. To show just how different perception of new tech can be on either end of the cash register, a recent survey conducted by Visa found that a strong majority of consumers, 86%, showed interest in using biometric technology for payments. Retailers, on the other hand, are far slower to adopt these technologies. That is likely because of the uncertain perception of safety that this novel technology still has. Another factor is almost certainly the cost associated with transitioning. This is especially true for retailers in the US, who have just recently paid money to upgrade to the new EMV technology. This very concern shows the downside to “siloed,” or proprietary approaches to payment tech. The name of the game for the current generation of payments is interoperability. That’s why Moolah works to make accepting credit card for small business a thing of beauty and simplicity—and most importantly, we seek to bridge the gap between the wants of consumers and business owners, and making you ready for what’s coming next in payments.

Oops! We could not locate your form.

Surcharge FAQ

Surcharge Compliance

If you are considering introducing a credit card surcharge for your patients, it is important to understand that there are specific rules and regulations that must be followed when enrolling in and operating under a surcharge plan.

This article provides a general overview of common surcharging requirements. This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It is the responsibility of each merchant to review, understand, and comply with all applicable laws, card-network rules, and regulatory requirements, including notification timeframes, signage requirements, surcharge percentage limits, and jurisdictions where surcharging is prohibited.

If you are unsure about the laws or regulations applicable to your practice, you should consult with qualified legal counsel. Moolah assumes no liability for a merchant’s compliance or non-compliance with credit card surcharging rules or regulations.

Transparent Communication
Card networks, including Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and American Express, require merchants to clearly and transparently disclose when a credit card surcharge is applied.

Practices must clearly notify patients of a credit card surcharge through appropriate signage placed at the practice entrance, at the point of sale or terminal, and anywhere payments are accepted. If payments are accepted online, surcharge disclosures must also be clearly visible on the practice’s website. All disclosures must inform patients that the surcharge applies only to credit card transactions.

Surcharge Limits
Credit card surcharges must comply with both card-network rules and applicable law. The surcharge amount may not exceed the merchant’s actual cost of accepting credit cards and may not exceed 3% of the total transaction amount.

Card-network rules cap credit card surcharges at 3%, meaning that if a merchant’s processing costs exceed this amount, the excess portion cannot be passed on to the patient.


Warning
The following is a general overview of credit card surcharging rules in the United States. Merchants are responsible for understanding and complying with all applicable requirements.

Network and State Restrictions
The major credit card networks, such as Visa and Mastercard, impose specific requirements related to surcharge limits, advance notification, and disclosure.

In addition, several U.S. states and territories regulate or prohibit credit card surcharging. At the time of writing, credit card surcharging is prohibited in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, and Puerto Rico. Other states, including Colorado, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, and New York, impose restrictions on surcharge amounts or require specific disclosures.

If your practice operates in a state that restricts or prohibits credit card surcharging, you must fully understand and comply with those requirements before implementing a surcharge.

Debit card transactions may never be surcharged, even if the debit card is processed as a credit transaction.

Applicability
Credit card surcharges may be applied only to credit card transactions. Other payment types, including debit cards and alternative payment methods, are not eligible for surcharging.

Regulatory Compliance
Merchants are responsible for maintaining ongoing compliance with all applicable card-network and legal requirements. This includes meeting advance notification obligations, using compliant signage and disclosures, adhering to surcharge percentage limits, and respecting jurisdiction-specific restrictions.

By following these guidelines, dental practices can implement credit card surcharging in a way that aligns with card-network rules and promotes transparency with patients. Clear and upfront communication helps maintain patient trust and supports a positive payment experience.